From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/533 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: categories Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: "weakened" operads Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:51:23 -0400 (AST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241017021 26156 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 14:57:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:57:01 +0000 (UTC) To: categories Original-X-From: cat-dist Thu Nov 20 15:51:38 1997 Original-Received: (from cat-dist@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA23337; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:51:23 -0400 (AST) Original-Lines: 49 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:533 Archived-At: Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:02:49 -0500 (EST) From: James Stasheff perhaps relevant is the recent developments of bar constructions for operads cf the special case of going fromt he dg Lie operad to the L_\infty operad ************************************************************ Until August 10, 1998, I am on leave from UNC and am at the University of Pennsylvania Jim Stasheff jds@math.upenn.edu 146 Woodland Dr Lansdale PA 19446 (215)822-6707 Jim Stasheff jds@math.unc.edu Math-UNC (919)-962-9607 Chapel Hill NC FAX:(919)-962-2568 27599-3250 On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, categories wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 16:07:01 -0800 (PST) > From: john baez > > In their book "Homotopy invariant structures on topological structures", > Boardman and Vogt construct from any topological operad O a new one WO, > which can be thought of as a "weakened" version of O in which all the > laws of O now hold only up to homotopy in a coherent way. > > Has there been any subsequent work clarifying this construction? Here > I'm not interested so much in all the *other* approaches to infinite > loop space machines, as in the notion of "weakening" a topological > operad. For example, Boardman and Vogt point out that their construction > can be used to discuss homotopy colimits, which makes me wonder if the > construction of WO from O could be done slickly using homotopy colimits. > Has anyone discussed this? > > Best, > John Baez > > >