From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/588 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: categories Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Combining monads Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 15:10:01 -0400 (AST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241017057 26386 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 14:57:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:57:37 +0000 (UTC) To: categories Original-X-From: cat-dist Wed Jan 14 15:10:16 1998 Original-Received: from localhost (cat-dist@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA26136; Wed, 14 Jan 1998 15:10:01 -0400 (AST) Original-Lines: 17 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:588 Archived-At: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 16:21:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Tom Leinster Is the pullback of a monadic functor along a monadic functor necessarily monadic? Is the diagonal of the pullback square monadic? Does this work if your restrict yourself to, say, finitary monadic functors? (E.g. it works for finitary monads on Set: the theory of sets with both ring and lattice structure (not interacting in any particular way) comes from a monad.) Thanks, Tom Leinster