From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/590 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: categories Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Combining monads Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 19:38:11 -0400 (AST) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241017058 26396 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 14:57:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:57:38 +0000 (UTC) To: categories Original-X-From: cat-dist Wed Jan 14 19:38:13 1998 Original-Received: from localhost (cat-dist@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA01585; Wed, 14 Jan 1998 19:38:11 -0400 (AST) Original-Lines: 20 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:590 Archived-At: Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 09:58:50 +1100 From: Ross Street >Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 16:21:51 +0000 (GMT) >From: Tom Leinster > > >Is the pullback of a monadic functor along a monadic functor >necessarily monadic? No. And I seem to remember this was one of the main points of the thesis (under Lawvere) of Michel Thie'baud. The thesis title was "Self-dual structure-semantics & algebraic categories" (Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, August 1971). Comonads (= cotriples) in Mod (= Bimod = Prof = Dist) are the subject. Using these to define "algebraic", Michel obtained stability under pullback. --Ross