categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Topos8@aol.com
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Equivalences and psuedo-equivalences (two items)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:46:40 EST	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9.51beea9c.2d68bb40@aol.com> (raw)

The answer to this question must be in the literature somewhere but I haven't
been able to track it down or figure it out for myself.

Let A and B be bicategories. By a functor from A to B I shall mean a morphism
of underlying reflexive globular sets that preserves all operations and
identities on the nose and satisfies the standard coherence conditions. A
psuedo-functor is a morphism that preserves operations and identities only up to  1
cells that are equivalences in B ( a 1-cell f is an equivalence if there is a
1-cell g such that fg and gf are both defined and isomorphic to the respective
identitity 1-cells). (These 1-cells must of course satisfy additional, standard
coherence conditions.)

An equivalence from A to B is a functor that is essentially surjective on
0-cells (every 0-cell of B is equivalent in B to a 0-cell in the image of F) and
which induces an equivalence of 1-categories between A( x,y ) and B ( Fx, Fy )
for all 0-cells x, y in A.
A psuedo-equivalence from A to B is a psuedo-functor that has these same
properties.

Question 1 : If F is a psuedo-equivalence from A to B does there exist an
equivalence G from A to B? (references/counterexamples?)

Question 2: Same as question 1 but with A and B strict 2-categories.

Qestion 3: If the answer to question 1 is yes, then can G be chosen to be
equivalent to F in the bicategory whose 0-cells are psuedo-functors from A to B?

I shall be very grateful for any guidance the list can provide on these
questions.

Carl Futia

------------------------------------------------------
SECOND ITEM:

Subject: Correction to my last query

I have to apologize for a silly error in my last request for help.

The problem lies with the definition of psuedo functor.  I should have
said that a psuedo functor preserves operations up to a 2-cell
isomorphism, not a 1-cell equivalence.  Sorry!

Carl Futia




             reply	other threads:[~2004-02-21 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-21 13:46 Topos8 [this message]
2004-02-24 22:34 Steve Lack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9.51beea9c.2d68bb40@aol.com \
    --to=topos8@aol.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).