From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lukasz at jany.st (Lukasz Janyst)
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 23:53:23 +0100
Subject: Render markdown files in tree view
In-Reply-To: <20161208201821.GA30275@john.keeping.me.uk>
References: <1481209561.3802441.812683353.7B835337@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20161208201821.GA30275@john.keeping.me.uk>
Message-ID: <1481237603.1507596.813167825.319B6E17@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016, at 21:18, John Keeping wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:06:01PM +0100, Lukasz Janyst wrote:
> In relation to the first patch specifically, I posted a more
> comprehensive series a couple of months ago following a request on the
> list, the thread starts here:
> 
> 	https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/cgit/2016-September/003289.html
> 
> Does that series work for your use case?  I think your patch will break
> rendering for genuine source code and that remains a key use case for
> CGit.

I checked the default syntax-highlighting.py and it still works fine
with my patches because it inserts all the tags it needs. The ones that
I removed were redundant. I did not check the other highlighter.

I have skimmed through your patches. I think it would work for my use
case. I especially like the idea of applying filters to binary blobs.
However, it seems to be pretty complicated. I can handle most of the use
cases I can think of with regular source filters provided that the two
patches to the C code are applied and I would be able to handle all of
them if I could apply source filters to binary blobs.

   Lukasz