From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: peter at colberg.org (Peter Colberg)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:23:03 -0500
Subject: Development Flow Improvements
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9oN-dpM2zsgcQby3nHukSdA_9LFrzX8WH=5LB11-E2kkA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHmME9o2g_5g8d6Ne4=UVO+Ur0oiD-=xcJ_JA==iYGiw+FnpLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH-DoZ5Zr2+Zg0qczdNouG-2HkPmB++BuXsxE4f04wepViW0jQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9oN-dpM2zsgcQby3nHukSdA_9LFrzX8WH=5LB11-E2kkA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20161124232303.ptr2lvw6vdywrwal@ceyx>

Hi Jason,

Thanks for tagging the new release!

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:27:38AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> zx2c4 at thinkpad ~/Projects/cgit $ git push
> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
> To ssh://git.zx2c4.com/cgit
>   ff9893a..11695a5  master -> master

May I suggest a minor improvement to the work flow?

Before pushing to "master" you can simulate pushing for a final review:

# git push -n
# git log -p -c -M --stat --decorate --pretty=fuller ff9893a..11695a5

(I use a git alias "review" for the latter.)

This allows one to catch things like an accidental revert of a submodule.

Peter