From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: john at keeping.me.uk (John Keeping)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:24:37 +0100
Subject: Rendering of README.md inline with inner tree view dirs
In-Reply-To: <20180612103525.442496aa@leda>
References: <bc038e1f-cae6-01d9-9b9e-56d2bea05efb@warmcat.com>
 <20180611093152.4821159f@leda>
 <eb08cac5-662f-c8a7-30d4-27f2aec3aafb@warmcat.com>
 <20180611095343.2865c71d@leda>
 <c2b0bba9-a2c4-6287-41a7-f68dc411a7d9@warmcat.com>
 <20180611153858.GJ1922@john.keeping.me.uk>
 <c18aa803-4182-59c2-e004-dfdef960e067@warmcat.com>
 <20180612103525.442496aa@leda>
Message-ID: <20180612092437.GK1922@john.keeping.me.uk>

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:35:25AM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Andy Green <andy at warmcat.com> on Tue, 2018/06/12 13:53:
> > 5) I get some gcc 8.1 warnings, I made a couple of patches to get around 
> > them.  In a couple of places, the code seemed legit really.
> 
> I do see these on Arch as well. :)
> Did not find the time to address them.
> 
> > [inline patches]
> > 
> > I should include these or the slightly dubious warnings are just 
> > regarded as an annoyance?
> 
> Definitely to be addressed. I pushed your changes here:
> 
> https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/commit/?h=ch/gcc-8&id=e7ac824f
> 
> Builds without warnings and tests are happy, but I did not yet take a
> detailed look.

We'll need those posted as proper patches with a sign-off though.  It
will also be easier to review them that way.


John