From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:53:23 +0100
Subject: cgit-lua: to jit or not to jit
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9qh==YTUwAg0=yAcUcSqrT7jSfzOQCUjfAR_vsYdiD0Rw@mail.gmail.com>
 (Jason A. Donenfeld's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:16:33 +0100")
References: <CAHmME9oAUNM-dF8Bq3E6omDqSfx5fExriTFr=W0rszdZ6WYpLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF7MipWEwTYp2UJO8-kNoVDEK0mPCQFBay7pYeCZTrqKYevx6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9pAXcyxypr0ogh4Or1DR-NBcyxDMed0m9uyu=6h=uRt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9qh==YTUwAg0=yAcUcSqrT7jSfzOQCUjfAR_vsYdiD0Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87lhyijq6k.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

* Jason A. Donenfeld:

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:10 AM, demetri <demetri.spanos at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1) PUC Lua works on more machines/architectures (though Mike has
>> substantially closed the gap for most architectures people care about in a
>> non-embedded non-mobile environment)
>
> Do you know what the gap is?
>
> LuaJIT supports x86, x86_x64, arm, ppc, e500, and mips. I guess that
> leaves, what? Sparc, AVR, ia64, ... other obscure ones? Hmm..

ppc64 and s390x.  Neither one is particularly obscure.