From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lsworkemail112 at gmail.com (Luke SanAntonio)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:06:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Added code to output the age as seconds instead of "0
 min."
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9qCMOGCg-0N=Y_xh4J6Y7P0R2WnYhjVL=QMzV_LCC63=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHmME9qQv5QDk=48kdV0sYxS5nuv7KVm_anGOZ1Q4Vff-1q7=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1348878616-10065-1-git-send-email-lsworkemail112@gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9pD+-D0vpvgBWVcVJP7ewDuLAjoEMnF_d1iYKcbDdqtsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+g5j+2CAL6ywzrKMehHABwS_hvRsHJcQGjdx5Z3P48yn8fRmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5067DDC6.7020403@hupie.com>
 <CAHmME9qCMOGCg-0N=Y_xh4J6Y7P0R2WnYhjVL=QMzV_LCC63=g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+g5j+2jGnNZUALCE5thhe9dBsAd5jsA2Ka0tBqs+kp_Vpa_5w@mail.gmail.com>

do you mean performance, or are you saying the system
might get confused? or neither? or both?

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Ferry Huberts <mailings at hupie.com> wrote:
>>
>> Try running a server with many big git repositories with a cgit interface on top, that is heavily used by people.
>> You'll really want to have caching.
>> Caching is not something I would like to see dropped or non-functional
>
>
> Do you suppose that the second-level granularity has a negative impact
> on cache behavior?