From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: richard.maw at gmail.com (Richard)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:16:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 03/17] Add a wrapper for get_sha1 called cgit_get_sha1
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9o6D-meOEPuyTgS-+ZZg2SBfKWdeH3vACzseLJ2Ld1wyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160702192826.20385-1-richard.maw@gmail.com>
 <20160702192826.20385-4-richard.maw@gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9o6D-meOEPuyTgS-+ZZg2SBfKWdeH3vACzseLJ2Ld1wyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAB2VqoYT5Y7xX-6S=OFS=bcrin4DOV6mX0h1qYd7s8U_zzT-jA@mail.gmail.com>

On 12 July 2016 at 00:12, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the churn here, but this doesn't apply, due to Lukas' recent
> patch. Could you respin this?

Sure thing, I should hopefully have this done late wednesday evening.

> By the way, feel free to alternatively submit this series with
> git-request-pull if you've got it in a repo somewhere.

That's a new one to me. I like patches on a mailing list for feedback,
but applying by e-mail is a faff, so sticking the output of
git-request-pull in the cover letter might be the best of both worlds
for me.

If you'd prefer just the request-pull text I can do that.