From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: fnaim42 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TmHDr20gRmF2aWVy?=)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:56:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Make default pages configurable
In-Reply-To: <20190815102618.GA10027@john.keeping.me.uk>
References: <20190813172221.10482-1-fnaim42@gmail.com>
 <20190815102618.GA10027@john.keeping.me.uk>
Message-ID: <CAHEx5ust5XB6J+Qjn-3We53wU4nYkf7SE6H3pNfC6qZnBuvnng@mail.gmail.com>

> Missing sign-off.  See https://developercertificate.org/ for what this
> means.

Sorry, I didn't realise signing off was required. Is this mentioned somewhere,
or just a tacit convention in most open-source projects?

> The commit message also needs to explain *why* we want this change in
> addition to how the change is implemented.

The rationale for the change seemed pretty obvious, but I'll make sure to
include a sentence or two about it.

Should I send the new patch as a new thread, or simply reply to this one?