From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:43:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 14/19] ui-summary.c: use struct strbuf instead of
 fixed-size buffers
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9puf=hTq+2xj3mjbr-WSt=A1BbK8dEoANmO6TRewdEL0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1365326321.git.john@keeping.me.uk>
 <4dd4fc55af2528bc676893c2bff8163d7f7d21d5.1365326321.git.john@keeping.me.uk>
 <CAHmME9ozyyb1Y=_e=NAGtvX-JDXyMEMHakEh-6XhTGYm1zbopw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130407123622.GY2222@serenity.lan>
 <CAHmME9puf=hTq+2xj3mjbr-WSt=A1BbK8dEoANmO6TRewdEL0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9oa492KMMwXSkKEE9i1N0rvFdzHJQS3mFdJLxfmCNrZCQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> Any opinions on using gcc's __attribute__((cleanup))? It could make
> things a bit cleaner, but it's something of an awful gcc hack.
>
> #define strbuf_auto struct strbuf __attribute__((cleanup(strbuf_release))

-fexceptions... nevermind.