From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:40:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] filter: add fprintf_filter function
In-Reply-To: <20140112193502.GS7608@serenity.lan>
References: <cover.1389546691.git.john@keeping.me.uk>
 <da4ef1081a0c71675e1750202b6b39aabf4d0ce8.1389546691.git.john@keeping.me.uk>
 <CAHmME9rdjLVJ_qPdHdehq0bWLQU5dV8zphJoi2jdZHabhYVv0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140112193502.GS7608@serenity.lan>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9okHda2-gmVnxJKGuv98ct71j5Rspyj3UvF-GtTG450KA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 8:35 PM, John Keeping <john at keeping.me.uk> wrote:
> I'm looking at splitting up the data so there is a filter object that
> contains function pointers to implementation functions and then some
> data that is specific to to given filter type.  With that change, cmd
> moves to the "exec filter" structure and is no longer accessible.  I'm
> expecting some filter types to have a structured value in the config
> file that will be parsed to multiple fields which will be glued back
> together in the fprintf function for that filter type.

Compelling enough. Merging this and the subsequent ones into
jd-jk/filterinfra. I'm doing a few extra patches on top of these as we
speak. Expect an email shortly when I'm finished.