From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 03:05:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] native inline gravatar In-Reply-To: <569ca21d-c5f7-a273-d5eb-f5fed50f5f0a@warmcat.com> References: <153041523536.31775.12330787152148492370.stgit@mail.warmcat.com> <569ca21d-c5f7-a273-d5eb-f5fed50f5f0a@warmcat.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 2:44 AM Andy Green wrote: > > looked at in depth. (See the list archives.) Our last conclusion from > > examining it was that so much of libgit is not re-entrant, and so we'd > > need to move to something like libgit2 for this to be feasible. Too > > many globals, etc. > > Let me guess, not enough people around working on this project, for some > reason, to move to libgit2. No, actually. The reason is that we'd like to stay close to what git.git is doing. > If that's your feeling about the whole stack of clientside stuff, I > understand you don't want to cooperate on it. I think you misinterpreted me. I think the clientside work you're doing is interesting and worth considering. I was speaking to somebody earlier today who is actually working on a JSON API for cgit, so that _all_ rendering can be done clientside. What I'm specifically rejecting in my comment here is adding gravatar support, some web service, in C directly to the core of cgit, when the lua support has no demonstrable problems.