From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:32:19 -0600
Subject: Syntax highlighting broken.
In-Reply-To: <52093620.9000605@hupie.com>
References: <51FFAE03.30901@bnl.gov>
 <CAHmME9pqKZ-ZR6CMpT=4rDyQiOS+NKsWHn=+QRZ6nm_Qt+C8Zw@mail.gmail.com>
 <52093620.9000605@hupie.com>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9pfv-6haDJ6czUJKcGeYVTi5sPa+bo+yG14mjxJM6wVSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Ferry Huberts <mailings at hupie.com> wrote:
> Either do none of it, or do all of it. I vote for all of it.
>
> Please resurrect the css

Right now we don't ship any highlighting css by default. It's up to
the admin on how the css should be integrated, and what highlighting
engine is in use. Perhaps different highlighted files will want
different css. It may be more efficient to spit out a <link> to a
style sheet or the actual styles in <style> from the actual
highlighting engine rather than ship them globally on each in every
page in the global styles document.