From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 22:26:08 +0100
Subject: Policy on global variables
In-Reply-To: <20140116212152.GH7608@serenity.lan>
References: <CAHmME9rKGfPx6ppX3VtN06Cd0YpAGCuzM4WW5A-sg7i3q6ZoTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140116005912.GA20306@dcvr.yhbt.net>
 <CAHmME9qWGtso5o+ao0FpsaVO_3ZoRbwoOK1G3Tp2aWtsD0iF2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFXTnz47EV_xFnz_7oNRZzeqaAWq6E0LcJFmmiy502TQ3KpTUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140116104751.GA26678@dcvr.yhbt.net>
 <CAHmME9qFQQaYbedFrVUdhE6ShSCJAQsMjzTbqYFTFd54pRw-Jw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140116130844.GF7608@serenity.lan>
 <CAHmME9oU=4JZA9AX-f5BfKd_MeMH-k5_M+0fegBkhs4eiTMWhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140116212152.GH7608@serenity.lan>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9qYcCniYEU7RU0OK-ZsKge+EZpXNVvt=H93og2WjyffSg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:21 PM, John Keeping <john at keeping.me.uk> wrote:
> The first step in this direction may actually be useful even if we stick
> with embedding libgit.a.

So what do you think ought to be done with the global-ctx patch? Merge
it, and then refactor afterward (whenever we "step in this
direction"), to get rid of the global? Or use what we have now
(without the patch) as a starting point for gradually getting rid of
the global?