From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:16:33 +0100
Subject: cgit-lua: to jit or not to jit
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pAXcyxypr0ogh4Or1DR-NBcyxDMed0m9uyu=6h=uRt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHmME9oAUNM-dF8Bq3E6omDqSfx5fExriTFr=W0rszdZ6WYpLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF7MipWEwTYp2UJO8-kNoVDEK0mPCQFBay7pYeCZTrqKYevx6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9pAXcyxypr0ogh4Or1DR-NBcyxDMed0m9uyu=6h=uRt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9qh==YTUwAg0=yAcUcSqrT7jSfzOQCUjfAR_vsYdiD0Rw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:10 AM, demetri <demetri.spanos at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) PUC Lua works on more machines/architectures (though Mike has
> substantially closed the gap for most architectures people care about in a
> non-embedded non-mobile environment)

Do you know what the gap is?

LuaJIT supports x86, x86_x64, arm, ppc, e500, and mips. I guess that
leaves, what? Sparc, AVR, ia64, ... other obscure ones? Hmm..

>
> 2) some Linux distributions include PUC Lua but few have LuaJIT installed
> by default, so from the user's perspective LuaJIT is one more dependency.
> Some people care about this and others don't.

Good point.