From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason at zx2c4.com (Jason A. Donenfeld) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:28:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] git: use xz compressed archive for download In-Reply-To: <20141224111336.16702.40789@typhoon.lan> References: <1408344244-14923-1-git-send-email-list@eworm.de> <20141224080110.15117.35731@typhoon.lan> <20141224111336.16702.40789@typhoon.lan> Message-ID: Oh, major bummer. I'll revert. What's upstream's stance on that? On Dec 24, 2014 12:13 PM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: > On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 at 09:40:07, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > > > > I don't think this is a good idea (I raised concerns weeks ago but > > > forgot to Cc the mailing list). > > > > > > > Shucks on the CC. > > > > > > I'd like to hear more opinions. > > *Who out there is deploying cgit on boxes that don't have tar's -J?* > > In case it wasn't obvious already: Me. OpenBSD's tar(1) does not support > that option: > > tar: unknown option -- J > usage: tar {crtux}[014578befHhjLmNOoPpqsvwXZz] > [blocking-factor | archive | replstr] [-C directory] [-I > file] > [file ...] > tar {-crtux} [-014578eHhjLmNOoPpqvwXZz] [-b blocking-factor] > [-C directory] [-f archive] [-I file] [-s replstr] [file > ...] > > Regards, > Lukas > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: