From: lm at mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy)
Subject: [COFF] Why did Motorola fail?
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:45:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180810154509.GA21082@mcvoy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC20D2NtaRuBbZOJgAdC3VT4VDhaCa-xNrES6Pu4GWGj0uP38Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:13:48AM -0400, Clem Cole wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Larry McVoy <lm at mcvoy.com> wrote:
> > My guess is cheaper as well.
>
> Maybe -- TI was the fab right? Moto's fabs were pretty good, not as good
> at Intel in those days.
I'm not sure who did the first SPARC, I'd guess TI, they did most of
the follow on designs. I know Fujitsu did some SPARC chips but I'm not
sure if that was solely for their own use or if Sun used those. But I
remember a lot of TI chips and TI was not speedy turning those around,
the hardware guys were under a lot of pressure to get it right the first
time (and I think that was rare).
> I never really thought much of the RISC chips, accept maybe the by the time
> of the MIPS 4400 series; but then again they were were designed for
> compiler writers.
>
> And the whole RISC thing was a bit of marketing.
Yeah, I tend to agree. But there was some wisdom in less is more, it was
easier to make the clocks go faster when the instructions are simple.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-10 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 2:23 grog
2018-08-10 2:55 ` stewart
2018-08-10 6:00 ` arno.griffioen
2018-08-10 7:24 ` dave
2018-08-10 7:44 ` bakul
2018-08-10 13:40 ` clemc
2018-08-10 14:43 ` lm
2018-08-10 15:13 ` clemc
2018-08-10 15:45 ` lm [this message]
2018-08-10 15:53 ` [COFF] Why did Motorola fail? (Cost and performance) david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180810154509.GA21082@mcvoy.com \
--to=coff@minnie.tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).