From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
Subject: [COFF] [TUHS] Will pdp 11/04 run unix?
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:26:01 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731212601.383EA18C0C0@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> (raw)
> From: Lars Brinkhoff
> I have seen conflicting information in sources dating from the 70s when
> the TV-11 and XGP-11 were very much in use.
> For several reasons, I believe the TV-11 was the first machine attached
> to the 10-11 interface, and the XGP-11 came second. This would lend
> some weak support for the theory that the first would be a 11/20 and the
> second a 11/10.
Yeah, but Clem's note reinforces my vague memory that the XGP-11 was an
-11/20.
I wish we had a picture of the Knight TV system (the system, not a
terminal). It's a extremely significant system - I believe it my have been the
first bit-mapped computer display system ever; and thus the prototype, in some
sense, for the display of every single personal compupter (including phones)
now extant - and so there _ought_ to be a photo of it. But looking online for
a while, I can turn up almost nothing about it! (I guess we should do a page
about it on the CHWiki...)
(Repeat my prior grump about how the AI Lab did all sorts of ground-breaking
stuff, because it was just 'tools', and not their main research focus, it's
hard to find out about a lot of it, e.g. the inter-ITS network file
system.)
But if you can find an image, even a low-res picture of that end of the AI Lab
machine room, we can tell what model the TV-11 is - early 11's had inteagrated
front panels, which are different for every model:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/PDP-11_Models.html
so you don't even need to be able to read anything to tell a /20 from a /10.
It was in a dual (I think - maybe triple, it's been a looooooong time :-)
rack which IIRC was along the side wall (i.e. the short building side) next to
the AI KA10 (which was sort of along the long wall, up in the corner).
I don't know if the XGP-11 code is still extant (my copy of the ITS filesystem
is offline right at the moment), but even if we look at the code, I'm not sure
we could tell; there are some _very minor_ programming differences between the
/20 and /10 (e.g. V bit on SWAB) - see the table at thd end of the PDP-11
Architecture Handbook - but I'd be aurprised if the code used any.
Surely there has to be _some_ picture of the machine room which shows it, even
if in the background.
> I did bring it up with TK at some point.
Try RG, too.
Noel
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-31 21:26 jnc [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-31 13:56 jnc
2020-07-31 15:32 ` lars
2020-07-31 18:53 ` clemc
2020-07-31 19:38 ` lars
2020-07-31 19:40 ` clemc
2020-07-31 20:00 ` bgbaumgart
2020-07-31 20:05 ` clemc
[not found] <20200730213720.109C018C0A5@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <20200731071008.GA33933@indra.papnet.eu>
2020-07-31 7:57 ` lars
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200731212601.383EA18C0C0@mercury.lcs.mit.edu \
--to=coff@minnie.tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).