From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:24:09 -0600 Subject: [COFF] =?utf-8?q?=5BTUHS=5D_RetroNet=E2=80=A6_Virtual_is_cheap=2E?= In-Reply-To: <20180906114129.1dd1ed21@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <1535565898.3905695.1490376112.4B7D3E18@webmail.messagingengine.com> <6e7783fb-ff06-2e21-002f-76bef263b63c@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <1d8c0539-8b43-9954-d8a7-db4dcc22b27d@texoma.net> <0b739af0-da9e-6bdb-fe17-6f2dda837de5@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20180901222055.GA71355@server.rulingia.com> <20180906114129.1dd1ed21@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> Message-ID: <2dcff0e3-139e-5a5f-b5b6-0f01debe4ff8@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> On 09/06/2018 09:41 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > Why not just dynamic update whenever the lease is renewed? If nothing > changes, no one will see any change. (I've run like that for 15 years > I think...) That does work from a client point of view. From a DNS administrators point of view, it's likely to cause unnecessary updates to the zone and subsequent transfers to slave servers. All of which is unnecessary. Perhaps this could be detected and avoided by returning a synthetic return to the client doing the update. -- Grant. . . . unix || die -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3982 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: