Computer Old Farts Forum
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pechter at gmail.com (William Pechter)
Subject: [COFF] 52-pin D-Sub?
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:40:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39399593-4023-4e44-9bb5-2139183cce84.maildroid@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC20D2M1FEkx83PVp+cmGRpg573cgyEMwoVnL17A-SiwAqtq=Q@mail.gmail.com>

Most of the RS232 spec seemed to be designed for Sync modems and their management. 

Most machines of the mini generation seemed to use either Async or Sync interfaces.  Stuff like the VT180 had a comm port that was a 8251  USART for serial comm that could be either sync or async.  I don't believe Dec had anything like that in that PDP11 or early Vax days.

Anyone care to enlighten me? 

Bill

Sent from pechter at gmail.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Clem Cole <clemc at ccc.com>
To: William Pechter <pechter at gmail.com>
Cc: Computer Old Farts Followers <coff at tuhs.org>
Sent: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:36
Subject: Re: [COFF] 52-pin D-Sub?

below...

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:26 PM William Pechter <pechter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Could it be because they all started with current loop tty interfaces?
> Most of the old DEC guys started with teletypes.
>
Very possible...





>
> Having struggled with a breakout box and different mini and micro vendors
> implementations of serial ports... Ugh.  And in three-wire the use of
> Xon-Xoff varied big time.   No standard was the standard.  IIRC the IBM
> Series/1 had a different 9pin layout than the PC/AR.  Why?
>
RS-232A/B/C was DB-25 P for the DTE (terminating equiment - a.k.a.
terminal) and S for DCE (communications equipment - a.k.a. modem).  It was
standardized.  At one time, I (sadly) could quote the paragraph number....


Then in 1978 #$%^& Lear Seglier put a DB-25S on a DTE (terminal).   They
were the cheap terminal vendor and all hell broke loose.

The PC/AT used 9 pin because the back of the unit was small and -- well
there could because IBM said so ....  But at least the IBM engineers kept
to Plug and Sockets from the standard.  I did not know the Series/1 used 9
pin.   Learn something new.




>   At least DEC was reasonably consistent until they moved too the Vax
> modified RJ design.
>
Indeed - that was a huge issue - the modified RJ block -- sigh...



>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/coff/attachments/20200228/129c18df/attachment.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-27 23:37 athornton
2020-02-28  0:04 ` dave
2020-02-28  1:37   ` stewart
2020-02-28  2:12     ` athornton
2020-02-28  4:12     ` dave
2020-02-28  4:18       ` dave
2020-02-28 14:11         ` clemc
2020-02-28 14:34           ` athornton
2020-02-28 21:23             ` dave
2020-02-28 16:35           ` krewat
2020-02-28 21:28             ` dave
2020-02-28 21:44               ` clemc
2020-02-28 21:58                 ` dave
2020-02-28 22:20                   ` clemc
2020-02-28 23:22                     ` pechter
2020-02-29 13:12                       ` emu
2020-02-29 15:45                         ` krewat
2020-02-29 15:49                           ` clemc
2020-02-28 22:38                   ` pechter
2020-02-28 22:05                 ` drb
2020-02-28 22:28                   ` clemc
2020-02-28 22:26                 ` pechter
2020-02-28 22:36                   ` clemc
2020-02-28 23:40                     ` pechter [this message]
2020-02-29 16:52                       ` clemc
2020-02-28 23:54                     ` pechter
2020-02-29  9:59 rudi.j.blom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39399593-4023-4e44-9bb5-2139183cce84.maildroid@localhost \
    --to=coff@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).