From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lars at nocrew.org (Lars Brinkhoff)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:10:30 +0000
Subject: [COFF] Comparative promptology
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1910290544171.17400@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 (Dave Horsfall's message of "Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:47:33 +1100 (EST)")
References: <201910272031.x9RKVSem124842@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU>
 <CAFH29trMHepMHK0C+UapNVXvjfnFMv5ov4W4YS+yOn4i+mhV0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANV78LQa=VTZAMmVeRphTvrkxrkrAzgoU_-KqtdgqfWY2uUZJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51f2d838-d097-a93f-b44d-9c670d206d2b@tnetconsulting.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.02.1910272110350.28402@frieza.hoshinet.org>
 <xzdtvssnnqfvfxq9swgv979g@localhost>
 <alpine.BSF.2.02.1910281106290.77349@frieza.hoshinet.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1910290544171.17400@aneurin.horsfall.org>
Message-ID: <7wsgnc4rfd.fsf_-_@junk.nocrew.org>

Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Steve Nickolas wrote:
>> 86-DOS actually did use ":" as a prompt character.
> The best I've ever seen was RT-11's "." - talk about minimalist...
>
> Actually this thread probably belongs on COFF by now.

I was bound to happen.  List all the prompts!

"*" seems popular on PDP-10s.