* Re: [COFF] [TUHS] Demise of TeX and groff (was: roff(7))
[not found] ` <4409b91cd794867d@orthanc.ca>
@ 2022-01-11 3:22 ` Adam Thornton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Adam Thornton @ 2022-01-11 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM); +Cc: Computer Old Farts Followers
Taking this to COFF...
> On Jan 10, 2022, at 7:13 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
>
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes:
>
>> As long as man pages are formatted with ?roff, I don't see it going
>> away. I don't suppose many people use troff any more, but there are
>> enough of us, and as long as man pages stay the way they are, I don't
>> think we're in any danger.
>
> Well there is mandoc(1). But as time goes by they just seem to be
> re-implementing nroff. Of course that *must* be easier than just
> learning n/troff in the first place :-P
As someone who did a lot of a Ph.D. in the history of computing, and then went into IT because he liked eating protein sometimes:
The great secret is that NO ONE EVER READS THE LITERATURE.
We have now made all the mistakes at least four times:
Once for each of mainframes, minis, micros, and mobile.
You can be a rock star at any development or operations job, even if you are, like me, a Bear Of Little Brain, simply by having some idea of what was tried already to solve a problem like this, and why it didn't work.
Which you can get by actually stopping to read up about your problem before diving headfirst into coding up a solution for it.
If you happen to get stinking rich from this advice, you can buy me a bottle of whiskey sometime.
Adam
_______________________________________________
COFF mailing list
COFF@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread