From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5391 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2021 15:02:35 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 14 Jul 2021 15:02:35 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A84B39BA3B; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 01:02:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA259B9C2; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 01:02:28 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="REX/CD2n"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E6C939B9C2; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 01:02:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com (mail-qv1-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B3495038 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 01:02:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id h9so1178878qvs.0 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:02:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rHB1UQCFs8r5F04IO1vUd5sh5zpXyA0D+uySnUxfesE=; b=REX/CD2nnoo4VHpPsv/ZsY3IaDUZkYR5+D19lLm1toJUsmCfeBJDlxRGHCWrtZxe59 c1U+ihKLwGzoHDgVb+j06hD3oVBaeMBwgKju9W9fVcQsdKJb0SWhxpnz6Gc3dCIMKfbO K+hjtlPvPwTfyt8dqda3IE/9SxxBrCqwuDixc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rHB1UQCFs8r5F04IO1vUd5sh5zpXyA0D+uySnUxfesE=; b=VJwOxgNrw830vVWtqiCYAH5PEoJEeBnp2pxr0oGLIzh8gzM0fbY7WQhFMliKEhz3mC K8+Wp0Pz84XMbZtLz0xw4hBepIpKnGacXk3ntVzy9kkTq98U4Tfs8GVpt6nK7zyxUJ1O FatrPmrqk58oWbHRBIn03XuX8gx4NhdYkYrKWHQa4YApAoAe5ep3NMWqPXR9RTD2o07I /M/YWZqi4ShrcDijUxfvDHZWlklcUsCVwu/N0YoW0K7RtlKlXGvuscg1Q3/R3tLQ4pEJ czfuEnZcG9E8wInNoyJaAWcm+68W6Gv+sjXysaCxgbm55FJJTJOlw7dtMaGvoLh0hzDD wokA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JZ7q+T1ThsdLCt9svN5rTpjlMxPTRGGeqZTqvZqja7thKHlp/ RBbA20hqVVydfA1tVrN7dul7kTjoNiaWLuhS49fzpaIx3U/7iA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyF/6w0OMK6Pq5u5aiJCVzkmM4O3UWfekLwxv1fFZHRad3ffFRkNlV79Q68lGmx/xQZEiztWkk0eezT/bfGIIw= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f6c6:: with SMTP id d6mr11514737qvo.30.1626274944758; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <213a4c11-3ab2-4b4a-8d6b-b52105a19711@localhost> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:01:58 -0400 Message-ID: To: Computer Old Farts Followers Subject: Re: [COFF] [TUHS] 386BSD released X-BeenThere: coff@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Computer Old Farts Forum List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5185146699958070020==" Errors-To: coff-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "COFF" --===============5185146699958070020== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000063c90005c716a414" --00000000000063c90005c716a414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sigh ... Warren I am going to ask for your indulgence once here on TUHS as I try to get any *new* discussion moved to COFF, but I guess it's time to renew this history as enough people have joined the list since the last time this was all discussed ... I'll do this once -- please take any other discussion off this list. It has been argued too many times. Many of the actors in this drama are part of the list. Sadly we have lost a few, sometimes because of the silliness of the argument/trying to give people credit or not/person preferences, etc. If you want to comment, please go back and read both the TUHS and COFF archives and I suspect your point may have already been made. *If you really do have something new, please move to COFF.* On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:21 AM Angus Robinson wrote: > Looking at a few online sources, Linus actually said when "386BSD came > out, Linux was already in a usable state, that I never really thought about > switching. If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux > would probably never had happened". > A number of us, such as Larry and I have discussed this a bunch both online and in person. What would become 386BSD was actually available as early as 1988, but you needed to know the public FTP address of where to get it at UCB (which the UCB licensees had access to that FTP server). Bostic was still working on what would become the 'NET' release, but this tarball offered a bootable system and did have things in it that later AT&T would require UCB to remove. In fact, this system would have X10 ported to it and was a reasonably complete 'distro' in today's terms. By formal definition, the tarball and the rest of UNIX from Research is and always has been, '*Open Source*' in the sources were available. *But they were licensed*. This was fairly typical of much early software BTW. The binary nature only came about with the minicomputers. The tarball in question was fairly easy to find in the wild but to use the sources as a system, you technically needed an AT&T license. An practically you needed access to a BSD box to rebuild them, which took a license - although by then SunOS was probably close enough - although I do not know anyone that tried it. The sources in the tarball were not '*Free and Open Source*' -- which becomes the crux of the issue. [Sadly the OSS folks have confused this over the years and that important detail is lost]. Many people, such as myself, when the AT&T suite began got worried and started hacking on Linux at that point as the not nearly as mature but sort of works version without networking or graphics had appeared [386BSD had both and a real installer - more in a minute] FWIW: Linus could have had access to the BSD for a 386 tarball if we had asked in the right place. But as he has said later in time, he wanted to write his own OS and did not both ask the right folks at his University, or try to get permission. Although he has said he access to Sun3 and has said that was his impetus for his work. This is an important point that Larry reminds us of, many institutions kept the sources locked away like his U of Wis. Other places were like liberal about access. IIRC Larry sometimes refers to it as the "UNIX Club." In my own case, I was running what would become 386BSD on my Wyse 32:16 box at home and on an NCR 386 based system in Clemson as I was consulting for them at the time. I also helped Bill with the PC/AT disk driver[WD1003 and later WD7000/SCSI controllers], as I had access to the docs from WD which Bill did not. I think I still have a photocopy of them. What basically happened is as BSDi forked and that begets a number of things, from hurt feelings to a famous law suite. A number of us, thought the latter was about copyright (we were wrong it was about trade secret). We were worried that the AT&T copyright would cause UNIX for an inexpensive processor to disappear. We >>thought<< (incorrectly) that the copyright that Linux was using, the GPL, would save us. Turns out >>legally<< it would not have, if AT&T had won, at least in the USA and most NATO Allies - the trade secret applied to all implementations of Ken, Dennis, and the rest of the BTL folk's ideas. All of the Unix-like systems were in violation at this point. BSDi/UCB was where AT&T started. The problem is that while the court found that AT&T did create and own the >>ideas<< (note ideas are not the source code implementation of the ideas), they could not call the UNIX 'IP', trade secrets since the AT&T people published them all both academically in books like Maury Bach's, much less they had been forced by the 1956 consent decree to make the license available, they had taught an industry. BTW: It's not just software, the transistor 'gets out' of AT&T under the same type of rules. In reality, like PGP, since there was lots of UNIX-based IP in other places, it hard to see in practice how AT&T could have enforced the trade secret. But again -- remember Charlie Brown (AT&T CEO) wants to go after IBM, thinking the big money in computers in the mainframe. So they did believe that they could exert pressure on UNIX-like systems for the higher end, and they might have been able to enforce that. --00000000000063c90005c716a414 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sigh ... Warre= n I am going to ask for your indulgence once here on TUHS as I try to get a= ny new discussion moved to COFF, but I gues= s it's time to renew this history as enough people have joined the list= since the last time this was all discussed ...=C2=A0 I'll do this once= -- please take any other discussion off this list.=C2=A0=C2=A0It has been = argued too many times.=C2=A0 =C2=A0Many of the actors in this drama are par= t of=C2=A0the list.=C2=A0 Sadly we have lost a few, sometimes because of th= e silliness of the=C2=A0argument/trying to give people credit or not/person= preferences, etc.

=
If you want to comment, please go back and read = both the TUHS and COFF archives and I suspect your point may have already b= een made.=C2=A0 =C2=A0If you real= ly do have something new, please move to COFF.

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at = 4:21 AM Angus Robinson <angus@= fairhaven.za.net> wrote:
Looking at = a few online sources, Linus actually said when "386BSD came out, Linux= was already in a usable state, that I never really thought about switching= . If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probabl= y=C2=A0never had happened".
A number of us, such as=C2=A0Larry and I have discussed th= is a bunch both online and in person.=C2=A0 =C2=A0What would become 386BSD = was actually available as early as=C2=A01988, but you needed to know the pu= blic FTP address of where to get it at UCB (which the UCB licensees had acc= ess=C2=A0to that FTP server).=C2=A0 Bostic was still working on what would = become the 'NET' release, but this tarball offered a bootable syste= m and did have things in it that=C2=A0later AT&T would require UCB to r= emove.=C2=A0 In fact, this system would have X10 ported to it and was a rea= sonably complete 'distro' in today's terms.
=

By formal definition, the tarball and the rest of UNIX fro= m Research is and always has been, 'Open Source' in the sour= ces were available.=C2=A0 But they were licensed.=C2=A0 This was fai= rly typical of much early=C2=A0software BTW.=C2=A0 The binary nature only c= ame about with the minicomputers.

The t= arball in question was fairly easy=C2=A0to=C2=A0find in the wild but to use= the sources as a system, you technically needed an AT&T license.=C2=A0= An practically=C2=A0you needed=C2=A0access to a BSD box to=C2=A0rebuild th= em,=C2=A0which took a license - although by then SunOS was probably close e= nough - although I do not know anyone that tried it.

The sources in the tarball were not 'Free and Open Sour= ce' -- which becomes the crux of the issue.=C2=A0 [Sadly the OSS fo= lks have confused this over the years and that important detail is lost].= =C2=A0 =C2=A0Many people, such as myself, when the AT&T suite began got= worried and started hacking on=C2=A0 Linux at that point as the not nearly= as mature but sort of works version without networking or graphics had app= eared [386BSD had both and a real installer - more in a minute]

<= font color=3D"#0000ff">FWIW: Linus could have had access to the BSD for a 3= 86 tarball if we had asked in the right place. But as he has said later in = time, he wanted to write his own OS and did not both ask the right folks at= his University, or try to get=C2=A0permission.=C2=A0 =C2=A0Although he has= said he access to Sun3 and has said that was his impetus=C2=A0for his work= .=C2=A0 =C2=A0This is an important point that Larry reminds us of, many ins= titutions kept the sources locked away like his U of Wis.=C2=A0 =C2=A0Other= places were like liberal about access.=C2=A0 IIRC Larry sometimes refers t= o it as the "UNIX Club."

In my= own case, I was running what would become 386BSD on my Wyse 32:16 box at h= ome and on an NCR 386 based system in Clemson as I was consulting for them = at the time.=C2=A0 I also helped Bill with the PC/AT disk driver[WD1003 and= later WD7000/SCSI controllers], as I had access to the docs from WD which = Bill did not.=C2=A0 I think I still have a photocopy of them.

What basically happened is as BSDi forked and that bege= ts a number of things, from hurt feelings to a famous=C2=A0law suite.=C2=A0= =C2=A0A number of us, thought the latter was about copyright (we were wron= g it was about trade secret).=C2=A0 We were worried that the AT&T copyr= ight would cause UNIX for an inexpensive processor to disappear.=C2=A0 =C2= =A0We >>thought<< (incorrectly) that the copyright that Linux w= as using, the GPL, would save us.=C2=A0 Turns out >>legally<< i= t would not have, if AT&T had won, at least in the USA and most NATO Al= lies - the trade secret applied to all implementations of Ken, Dennis, and = the rest of the BTL folk's ideas.=C2=A0 All of the Unix-like systems we= re in violation at this point.=C2=A0 BSDi/UCB was where AT&T started.= =C2=A0 The problem is that while the court found that AT&T did create a= nd own the >>ideas<< (note ideas are not the source code implem= entation of the ideas), they could not call the=C2=A0UNIX 'IP', tra= de secrets since the AT&T people published them all both academically i= n books like Maury Bach's, much less they had been forced by the 1956 c= onsent decree to make the license available, they had taught an industry.= =C2=A0 BTW:=C2=A0 It's not just software, the transistor 'gets out&= #39; of AT&T under the same type of rules.

In reality, like P= GP, since there was lots of UNIX-based IP in other places, it hard to see i= n practice how AT&T could have enforced the trade secret.=C2=A0 But aga= in -- remember Charlie Brown (AT&T CEO) wants to go after IBM, thinking= the big money in computers in the mainframe.=C2=A0 So they did believe tha= t they could exert pressure on UNIX-like systems for the higher end, and th= ey might have been able to enforce that.

--00000000000063c90005c716a414-- --===============5185146699958070020== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KQ09GRiBtYWls aW5nIGxpc3QKQ09GRkBtaW5uaWUudHVocy5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9taW5uaWUudHVocy5vcmcvY2dp LWJpbi9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2NvZmYK --===============5185146699958070020==--