From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: clemc at ccc.com (Clem Cole) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:45:15 -0500 Subject: [COFF] Building OS from source in the olden days In-Reply-To: <20201110231118.GW99027@eureka.lemis.com> References: <20201110231118.GW99027@eureka.lemis.com> Message-ID: Mumble -- For IBM and DEC in the 60s and early 70s, the manufactures distributed the (assembler) sources to the OS and we could (and did) build from source but usually just built parts. By the time of VMS and the other minis, you tended to link together from modules, although many sites did have sources (in assembler). Remember, the target was the manufacturers HW so they were not giving away much. In the case of IBM, eventually, Amdahl started cloning and they got a tad more closed, but by that time there were also many mainframe OS flavors in wild. That said, I think Burrough's gave away the ESPOL code for their systems, but I never saw it; so I can not speak definitively there. Unix was different. Like Burrough's, it was heavily written in a systems programming language. To my knowledge, the 'concept' or 'porting' the OS in it's entirety to a completely new ISA began with UNIX. On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 6:11 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I'm currently reviewing a paper about Unix and Linux, and I made the > comment that in the olden days the normal way to build an OS image for > a big computer was from source. Now I've been asked for a reference, > and I can't find one! Can anybody help? > > Greg > -- > Sent from my desktop computer. > Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key. > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. > This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program > reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA > _______________________________________________ > COFF mailing list > COFF at minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coff > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: