From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter at rulingia.com (Peter Jeremy) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:32:24 +1100 Subject: [COFF] [TUHS] cut, paste, join, etc. In-Reply-To: References: <26484818-2f05-37d3-adff-6e34d383e117@gmail.com> <399f2cdc-d790-c4fe-18e3-0cb6b4c76554@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <55d60220-c22d-c99f-f40c-68a741183213@gmail.com> Message-ID: => COFF since it's left Unix history behind. On 2021-Feb-16 21:08:15 -0700, Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: >I like SQLite and Berkeley DB in that they don't require a full RDBMS >running. Instead, an application can load what it needs and access the >DB itself. I also like SQLite and use it quite a lot. It is a full RDBMS, it just runs inside the client instead of being a separate backend server. (BDB is a straight key:value store). >I don't remember how many files SQLite uses to store a DB. One file. I often ship SQLite DB files between systems for various reasons and agree that the "one file" is much easier that a typical RDBMS. -- Peter Jeremy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: