From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@hamartun.priv.no>
Cc: coff@minnie.tuhs.org, Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Subject: Re: [COFF] 386BSD released
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 08:37:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPLO9O9hC4gOJaNO@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2o8b178pr.fsf@thuvia.hamartun.priv.no>
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 08:30:56AM +0200, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
>
> I seem to remember, relatively shortly after that, a tendency on the net
> to differentiate between "open source" and "Open Source". Earlier in
> this thread, I mentioned MINIX 1, from 1987. That version of the OS was
> open source, but not, by the later definition, Open Source.
> (Prentice-Hall, being a publishing company, insisted on having the
> copyright, but the source code was printed in the book, and you could
> order it on floppies or tape for $80.)
Can you provide any references? A quick Google Search doesn't turn up
what you've described. Instead there are references such as this:
"What you will find here is the contents of the last Minix 1 and 2
releases, 1.7.5 and 2.0.4...
You won't find all the source here, because Minix came with most
source, but not all; the C compiler is ACKPACK, a special version
of the Amsterdam Compiler Kit, carefully cut down and modified to
run on Minix. Back when this was released, this wasn't open source."
- https://github.com/davidgiven/minix2
I can imagine marketing folks trying to confuse people by trying to
claim that their product was something it was not --- such as from
Prentice Hall, the publisher of the Minix book.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
COFF mailing list
COFF@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-17 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7wtukxtgag.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
[not found] ` <CAKH6PiVCjo3YnTZUVYOCDeffQ6POVwGAQA1QMR9UinkfGn+AmQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-15 6:33 ` [COFF] [TUHS] " Michael Kjörling
2021-07-15 20:44 ` Derek Fawcus
2021-07-15 15:07 ` Clem Cole
2021-07-15 19:33 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-15 20:30 ` Clem Cole
2021-07-16 1:58 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-16 2:14 ` George Michaelson
2021-07-16 18:02 ` Grant Taylor via COFF
2021-07-17 4:09 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-17 6:30 ` [COFF] " Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via COFF
2021-07-17 12:37 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2021-07-17 13:30 ` Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via COFF
2021-07-18 3:29 ` [COFF] [TUHS] " Grant Taylor via COFF
2021-07-18 3:42 ` David Arnold
2021-07-18 4:01 ` Grant Taylor via COFF
2021-07-19 13:41 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-19 14:50 ` Clem Cole
2021-07-19 17:38 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-19 19:33 ` John P. Linderman
2021-07-19 20:21 ` Clem Cole
2021-07-20 1:05 ` Grant Taylor via COFF
2021-07-19 20:08 ` Clem Cole
2021-07-20 0:55 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-07-18 6:44 ` Andy Kosela
2021-07-16 16:11 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-07-15 23:02 ` joe mcguckin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPLO9O9hC4gOJaNO@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=coff@minnie.tuhs.org \
--cc=gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net \
--cc=tih@hamartun.priv.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).