On 3/20/20 1:43 PM, Grant Taylor via COFF wrote: > What I think I'm hearing you say is that with RPN you were shouldering > part of the computational load based on how you were entering things so > that they aligned as necessary with the stack.  Conversely, you were > simply "plug and chug" (as I've heard elsewhere).  Meaning you entered > the equation / formula and were largely hands off from the calculation. I can see how this could be translated to RPN could cause someone to feel like they have a better understanding of what's being calculated. Conversely, infix notation leaving someone feeling separated from the calculation and having much less of an understanding of what's being calculated. This separation making it more likely that people will have problems estimating and having any idea if what they're doing makes any sense or not. -- Grant. . . . unix || die -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4013 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: