From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:13:12 -0600 Subject: [COFF] =?utf-8?q?=5BTUHS=5D_RetroNet=E2=80=A6_Virtual_is_cheap=2E?= In-Reply-To: <20180906154240.6fdbdc68@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <1535565898.3905695.1490376112.4B7D3E18@webmail.messagingengine.com> <6e7783fb-ff06-2e21-002f-76bef263b63c@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <1d8c0539-8b43-9954-d8a7-db4dcc22b27d@texoma.net> <0b739af0-da9e-6bdb-fe17-6f2dda837de5@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20180901222055.GA71355@server.rulingia.com> <20180906114129.1dd1ed21@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <2dcff0e3-139e-5a5f-b5b6-0f01debe4ff8@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20180906154240.6fdbdc68@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> Message-ID: On 09/06/2018 01:42 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > I doubt the communications overhead is noticed in the hailstorm of video > going over the networks in question. Your Milage May Differ. The problem isn't bandwidth related. It's more that it will cause additional and completely unnecessary (what is tantamount) to DB transactions and fan out replication to all other servers. For something that is a completely unnecessary change. It functionally rolls the serial number and all the additional overhead associated with it. Because someone didn't check if the IP actually changed. Compound this by 100s ~ 1,000s of customers doing the same thing. -- Grant. . . . unix || die -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3982 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: