From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 19:41:54 -0700 Subject: [COFF] OSI stack In-Reply-To: <20190207192821.7hjsf6atfyi747sb@h-174-65.A328.priv.bahnhof.se> References: <20190206174913.E518318C07B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <0572e855-9aac-337f-4f1b-66dda3839e14@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20190207192821.7hjsf6atfyi747sb@h-174-65.A328.priv.bahnhof.se> Message-ID: On 2/7/19 12:28 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote: > While different, I think that the introduction of the more advanced > IPv6 address formats into DNS also qualifies. I don't recall off hand if > bit-string labels (which were used for reverse lookups) or the A6 RRtype > (for forward lookups) was the more problematic one, but I do recall that > both had issues that made real-world adoption non-trivial in the best > of cases. Middle boxes that (mis)interpret DNS traffic are still a problem. Admittedly less of a problem. I suspect even less after the DNS Flag Day we recently had. -- Grant. . . . unix || die -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4008 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: