Took this to coff since it's really hardware and non-Unix... On 2/8/20 1:59 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: Dave Horsfall > > > [ Getting into COFF territory, I think ] > > > > > In all fairness, the entire field didn't really appreciate the metastability > issue until the LINC guys at WUSTL did a big investigation of it, and then > started a big campaign to educate everyone about it - it wasn't DEC being > particularly clueless. > > > > Hey, if the DEC marketoids didn't want 3rd-party UNIBUS implementations > > then why was it published? > > Well, exactly - but it's useful to remember the differening situation for DEC > from 1970 (first PDP-11's) and later. > > In 1970 DEC was mostly selling to scientists/engineers, who wanted to hook up > to some lab equipment they'd built, and OEM's, who often wanted to use a mini > to control some value-added gear of their own devising. An open bus was really > necessary for those markets. Which is why the 1970 PDP-11/20 manual goes into > a lot of detail on how to interface to the PDP-11's UNIBUS. > > Later, of course, they were in a different business model. > > Noel My old Field Service memory is DEC never really went after Unibus interfaces and the spec was open.  It was connections to the big old Massbus for things like tapes and disks that they kept closed and used patent protection on along with the SBI and the later Vax BI bus.  DEC was the only maker of the BIIC chip from the VAXBI and the wouldn't sell it to competitors... Braegan (may be a spelling error) made interfaces to connect Calcomp hard disks to the PDP11's on a Massbus.  IIRC they were shut down hard with legal action.  I had a customer with a Unisys (formerly RCA) Spectra 70 system that had Braegan Calcomp drives with an Eatontown, NJ based  Diva Disk controller.  My tech school instructor pre-DEC career worked for Diva Disk as an engineer. Systems Industries, later (EMC), cloned the Massbus Adapter on the SBI Bus and didn't directly share the bus or controller with DEC sold disk drives so the SI-9400 showed up on DEC 11/780's (and I think they had an 11/70 controller as well.  DEC, IIRC went after them about them using the SBI backplane interconnect. A Google search showed up this note about EMC Memory boards in Vaxes but also mentions DEC patent suits against people who used the Massbus.  I don't remember that on Unibus devices like the controllers from Emulex and others. (Until they tried to deal with the Vax BI bus -- a DEC chip only or the MSCP disk subsystems.) Like you say, different time, different business model.  Many inside DEC wanted them to OEM Sell Vax chips like they did PDP11 LSI/F11/J11 chips.  There are a number of DECcies who feel that attitude came over with the influx of IBM'ers and others who came to DEC in the Vax period to sell into the Data Centers. They were really protecting the "family-er-crown jewels" back then to the company's detriment. Old Computerworld and Datamation adverts along with PR releases are what I find when searching, unfortunately.  Here's a suit against EMC --  which cloned DEC memory products and interfaced to the SBI 11/78x  bus. https://books.google.com/books?id=0sNDKMzgG8gC&pg=RA1-PA70&dq=DEC%2BMassbus%2BPatent&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwje5YDE1sLnAhXqmOAKHdXLCOwQ6AEwAXoECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=DEC%2BMassbus%2BPatent&f=false Along with the DIVA Computroller V there's another picture at the left of the page with a different emulating controller. Here's a Legal CDC9766 (I think) on a Plessey controller that plugged into an RH70 but didn't use the actual DEC Massbus (probably the CDC A and B SMD cables... (Storage Module Device? IIRC) https://books.google.com/books?id=-Nentjp6qSMC&pg=RA1-PA66&dq=eatontown,+nj+disk+controller+microprocessor&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj5r76f2MLnAhXCrFkKHeRCD_cQ6AEwAXoECAMQAg#v=onepage&q=eatontown%2C%20nj%20disk%20controller%20microprocessor&f=false DEC even took the Emulex controllers on service contract in the late 80's. Bill