From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: michael at kjorling.se (Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:57:22 +0000 Subject: [COFF] Comparative promptology In-Reply-To: References: <201910272031.x9RKVSem124842@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> <51f2d838-d097-a93f-b44d-9c670d206d2b@tnetconsulting.net> <7wsgnc4rfd.fsf_-_@junk.nocrew.org> Message-ID: On 28 Oct 2019 13:57 -0600, from imp at bsdimp.com (Warner Losh): > "@ " was the TOPS-20 prompt. > "$ " was the VMS prompt > RSTS/E was just "Ready\n" > > But none of these get us closer to CP/M's > prompt. For micros, the Apple II used "]", didn't it? That's not exactly a ">" either, but it's somewhat period- and system size-appropriate for early CP/M. -- Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael at kjorling.se “The most dangerous thought that you can have as a creative person is to think you know what you’re doing.” (Bret Victor)