From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5010
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Lautenbacher <jtl@tkm.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Topics: Two comments
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 17:06:24 +0100
Message-ID: <"nz11.rz.un.471:01.02.96.16.14.17"@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
References: <rjspgyq0q6.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <w8s7my8qehy.fsf@aegir.ifi.uio.no> <rjvilsniv6.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.41)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145673 31490 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:27:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:27:53 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA29470 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:02:05 -0800
Original-Received: from nz11.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (nz11.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.7]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <SAA03360@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 18:04:02 +0100
Original-Received: from tkmhp1.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de (actually tkmhp12.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de) 
          by nz11.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 1 Feb 1996 17:10:28 +0100
Original-Received: by tkmhp1.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA24290;
          Thu, 1 Feb 1996 17:06:24 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: <rjvilsniv6.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5010
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5010

>>>>> "PA" =3D=3D Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

>>>>> "LMI" =3D=3D Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
    LMI> It was much easier to write the code using a single root. 
=09[...]
    PA> A one-line *Group* buffer doesn't seem very useful to me.

    LMI> The people who don't like it can just rename it to "".

    PA> ----------------------------------------
    PA> [  -- 6 ]
    PA>   [ Emacs -- 4 ]
    PA>       2:=A0nnml:ding.list            Mail to the Gnus list
=09[...]

    PA> What I would like is:

    PA> ----------------------------------------
    PA> [ Emacs -- 4 ]
    PA>     2:=A0nnml:ding.list            Mail to the Gnus list
=09[...]
    PA> Maybe by setting a
    PA> `gnus-group-hide-top-level-topic-and-don't-indent-second-level-topi=
cs'
    PA> variable?

I _strongly_ second that. There should also be a variable which would
tell GNUS where to add groups not belonging to any topic yet. 
So newly subscribed groups would always added e.g. to `Misc'. 

Maybe one could go a little further and provide for the possibility
that new groups (zombies) should be added to a on-the-fly created
topic called e.g. `New Groups'? Maybe with on-the-fly created subtopic
according to their Usenet names?

(I know, it would be better if I actually _coded_ this ...)

       __/__/ __/__/__/ __/            Jens Lautenbacher 
         __/    __/    __/     
        __/    __/    __/      mailto:jens@ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de
  __/  __/    __/    __/       mailto:jtl@tkm.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de
 __/  __/___ __/___ __/__/__/_________________________________________
  __/__/                     =