From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31915 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: No Cc on wide reply Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:47:26 -0400 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <00Jul24.124728edt.115243@gateway.intersys.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168271 16771 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7FFD051F for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:39:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAC09468; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:36:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:33:59 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA16681 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:33:43 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from intersys.com (gateway.intersys.com [198.133.74.253]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E833D051F for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by gateway.intersys.com id <115243>; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:47:28 -0400 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "24 Jul 2000 11:05:41 -0400" Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31915 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31915 * prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) on Mon, 24 Jul 2000 | OTOH, setting Reply-To to point to a mailing list is misuse of | Reply-To as well.[0] (Even when it's done by users instead of the | list software, I say.) No, it is potentialy very, very bad, but semantically correct. Its one of those things that is allowed by the spec but should not be done. -- Rat \ Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid core, Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ which, if exposed due to rupture, should PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.