From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36432 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sender header? Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:08:04 -0400 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: <01May25.160823edt.115290@gateway.intersys.com> References: <01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.163305edt.115259@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.172056edt.115272@gateway.intersys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172017 8529 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19062 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 20:08:52 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 19057 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 20:08:52 -0000 Original-Received: from gateway.intersys.com (HELO intersys.com) (198.133.74.253) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 20:08:52 -0000 Original-Received: by gateway.intersys.com id <115290>; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:08:23 -0400 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 24 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36432 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36432 * Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) on Fri, 25 May 2001 | The defacto standard for the locally interpreted string has changed. | These days, people want to hide the login names for security purposes. That is what things like sendmail's rewrite rules and tables are for. | A domain-literal need not be a FQDN, it can also be a domain name. | For example, uni-dortmund.de is a possible domain-literal, even though | there is no such host. A domain name is by its nature fully qualified. | The way I see it, your requirements for `reasonably configured' are | pretty steep, and what you want makes life really hard for people | working on systems which don't match your idea of `reasonably | configured'. This is pointless. While I tend to be very strict when it comes to networking, doing it right means that things are easier for everyone, not harder. It is when things are done wrong that life is made difficult for some people. -- Rat \ Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete. Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ PGP Key: at a key server near you! \