* Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML @ 2001-10-19 13:39 Kai Großjohann 2001-10-19 14:19 ` Oystein Viggen 2001-10-20 6:01 ` Daniel Pittman 0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-19 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) I think that many people want to use something like Netscape for viewing HTML, even if Emacs/W3 is installed. IMHO there should be a simple variable which people can set to achieve this. This can be implemented by changing mailcap-mime-data such that it checks the variable, not only looks whether the w3-foo function is bound. Opinions? kai -- GNU/Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 13:39 Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-19 14:19 ` Oystein Viggen 2001-10-19 15:52 ` Frank Schmitt 2001-10-19 16:30 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-20 6:01 ` Daniel Pittman 1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Oystein Viggen @ 2001-10-19 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding * [Kai Großjohann] > I think that many people want to use something like Netscape for > viewing HTML, even if Emacs/W3 is installed. IMHO there should be a > simple variable which people can set to achieve this. Do you mean like this? (setq browse-url-browser-function 'browse-url-netscape) Oystein -- This message was generated by a flock of happy penguins. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 14:19 ` Oystein Viggen @ 2001-10-19 15:52 ` Frank Schmitt 2001-10-19 16:24 ` David S. Goldberg 2001-10-19 16:30 ` Kai Großjohann 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Frank Schmitt @ 2001-10-19 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) Oystein Viggen <oysteivi@tihlde.org> writes: >>I think that many people want to use something like Netscape for >>viewing HTML, even if Emacs/W3 is installed. IMHO there should be a >>simple variable which people can set to achieve this. > >Do you mean like this? >(setq browse-url-browser-function 'browse-url-netscape) I'm quite sure he meant viewing html-emails and such stuff and the above only works for visiting links. -- One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. 19. Dezember 2001 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 15:52 ` Frank Schmitt @ 2001-10-19 16:24 ` David S. Goldberg 2001-10-19 17:54 ` Kai Großjohann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: David S. Goldberg @ 2001-10-19 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) How I deal with text/html email: (setq mm-discouraged-alternatives (list "multipart/related" "text/html" "text/richtext")) (setq mm-automatic-external-display '("text/html")) (setq mm-inline-override-types '("text/html")) This results in all text/html showing up as a button. I then do a view-interactive if I actually want to read it. I specify a shell script that calls netscape with the -remote option to pop up a new window as the viewer. I purposely do not pass the part to netscape automatically. 99% of the text/html I get I don't actually want to see. Unfortunately a lot of people at work send messages that contain both text/plain and text/html but send it as multipart/mixed instead of multipart/alternative so the text/html is just a redundant attachment. -- Dave Goldberg david.goldberg6@verizon.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 16:24 ` David S. Goldberg @ 2001-10-19 17:54 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-19 18:09 ` David S. Goldberg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-19 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: The Gnus Mailing List david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes: > How I deal with text/html email: > > (setq mm-discouraged-alternatives (list "multipart/related" > "text/html" "text/richtext")) > > (setq mm-automatic-external-display '("text/html")) > > (setq mm-inline-override-types '("text/html")) > > This results in all text/html showing up as a button. I then do a > view-interactive if I actually want to read it. Well, people have already put the right command to use in ~/.mailcap, so why not just use that? Also, I want to make it so that hitting RET on the MIME button invokes Netscape (or whatever was specified in ~/.mailcap) automatically, with no added fuss. My experience is that a lot of people want this behavior: for each text/html part, they see a button, and clicking this button invokes Netscape (or whatever). Therefore, we should make it easy for people to get this behavior. (Well, de-installing W3 would be easy but surely that's not the right approach.) kai -- GNU/Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 17:54 ` Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-19 18:09 ` David S. Goldberg 2001-10-19 21:27 ` Kai Großjohann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: David S. Goldberg @ 2001-10-19 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw) >> >> This results in all text/html showing up as a button. I then do a >> view-interactive if I actually want to read it. > Well, people have already put the right command to use in ~/.mailcap, > so why not just use that? In my case I haven't put it in .mailcap but that's just because I was too lazy. But maybe I'm confused. Are you saying that if I put my shell script in ~/.mailcap then C-u <part> K e, or the equivalent option on the button itself wouldn't do the right thing? If so then something is broken. I would expect that .mailcap entries should take precedence as the default action. -- Dave Goldberg david.goldberg6@verizon.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 18:09 ` David S. Goldberg @ 2001-10-19 21:27 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-20 10:11 ` Per Abrahamsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-19 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: The Gnus Mailing List david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes: > But maybe I'm confused. Are you saying that if I put my shell script > in ~/.mailcap then C-u <part> K e, or the equivalent option on the > button itself wouldn't do the right thing? If so then something is > broken. I would expect that .mailcap entries should take precedence > as the default action. With the correct entry in .mailcap, C-u 42 K e should indeed do the right thing. But my suggestion was to include a configuration option such that (a) buttons for text/html parts appear automatically, and (2) hitting RET or mouse-2 on such a button invokes whatever is in .mailcap. Implementing this is quite simple, I think, though I haven't tested it. Right now, there is the following entry in mailcap-mime-data: /---- | ("html" | (viewer . mm-w3-prepare-buffer) | (test . (fboundp 'w3-prepare-buffer)) | (type . "text/html")) \---- Now we introduce a new variable and say (test . (and foo (fboundp 'w3-prepare-buffer))) in the third line above. What do you think? kai -- GNU/Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 21:27 ` Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-20 10:11 ` Per Abrahamsen 2001-10-20 18:30 ` Henrik Enberg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Per Abrahamsen @ 2001-10-20 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) How aboud doing it like this: (defcustom mm-html-prepare-buffer (when (fboundp 'w3-prepare-buffer) 'w3-prepare-buffer) "Function used for inline rendering html in the current buffer. Set it to nil to disable inline html drawing." :type '(choice (const :tag "Disable" nil) function) :group 'mime-display) /---- | ("html" | (viewer . mm-html-prepare-buffer) | (test . (fboundp 'mm-html-prepare-buffer)) | (type . "text/html")) \---- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 10:11 ` Per Abrahamsen @ 2001-10-20 18:30 ` Henrik Enberg 2001-10-21 8:20 ` Per Abrahamsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Henrik Enberg @ 2001-10-20 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw) Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes: > How aboud doing it like this: > > (defcustom mm-html-prepare-buffer (when (fboundp 'w3-prepare-buffer) > 'w3-prepare-buffer) > "Function used for inline rendering html in the current buffer. > > Set it to nil to disable inline html drawing." > :type '(choice (const :tag "Disable" nil) function) > :group 'mime-display) This, I think is the way to go. Then I could write my owm function to call w3m.el instead. I currently have to have w3 installed just so I can defadvice `mm-inline-text' to use w3m.el. Henrik -- I'm CONTROLLED by the CIA!! EVERYONE is controlled by the CIA!! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 18:30 ` Henrik Enberg @ 2001-10-21 8:20 ` Per Abrahamsen 2001-10-21 14:25 ` Lloyd Zusman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Per Abrahamsen @ 2001-10-21 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> writes: > This, I think is the way to go. Then I could write my owm function to > call w3m.el instead. And submit it as a patch to be included in Gnus ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-21 8:20 ` Per Abrahamsen @ 2001-10-21 14:25 ` Lloyd Zusman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Lloyd Zusman @ 2001-10-21 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes: > Henrik Enberg <henrik@enberg.org> writes: > >> This, I think is the way to go. Then I could write my owm function to >> call w3m.el instead. > > And submit it as a patch to be included in Gnus ;-) If you do that, you could take a look at the functions I wrote and posted a couple days ago that do almost the same thing you're talking about. Look under this article here in the ding@gnus.org mailing list (the earlier articles in that thread discuss exactly what I'm trying to do with w3m rendering of html message parts): From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> Message-ID: <m2g08fdw8y.fsf@asfast.com> Subject: Re: How to do something a bit complicated with inline decoding? In addition to these functions, I have this in my .gnus.el. ;; Make sure that Gnus never tries to render HTML or ;; rich text. (setq mm-discouraged-alternatives '("text/html" "text/richtext")) (setq mm-inline-override-types mm-discouraged-alternatives) (setq mm-automatic-display (remove "text/html" mm-automatic-display)) Also, in the same thread, you could check this message, as well, for another, similar function. From: Raymond Scholz <ray-2001@zonix.de> Message-ID: <lgd.87669amwg0.fsf@mde1.zonix.de> Contained within all these functions is almost everything that's needed for this patch that's being discussed. I think that all that would have to be added is the connection to the mime types in mailcap, and perhaps a `defcustom' entry. -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 14:19 ` Oystein Viggen 2001-10-19 15:52 ` Frank Schmitt @ 2001-10-19 16:30 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-21 12:06 ` Oystein Viggen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-19 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Oystein Viggen <oysteivi@tihlde.org> writes: > * [Kai Großjohann] > >> I think that many people want to use something like Netscape for >> viewing HTML, even if Emacs/W3 is installed. IMHO there should be a >> simple variable which people can set to achieve this. > > Do you mean like this? > (setq browse-url-browser-function 'browse-url-netscape) AFAIK, this does nothing for multipart/mixed with text/html parts? [time passes] I now _know_ it does nothing, for I have that setting, and Gnus still uses W3 for displaying HTML. kai -- GNU/Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 16:30 ` Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-21 12:06 ` Oystein Viggen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Oystein Viggen @ 2001-10-21 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding * [Kai Großjohann] > AFAIK, this does nothing for multipart/mixed with text/html parts? Ah, sorry. I thought you meant when clicking on buttonized URLs. Personally, I never render html in mail or news messages, and I'm quite happy with it that way. But I figure that was not what you wanted, either :) Oystein -- When in doubt: Recompile. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-19 13:39 Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML Kai Großjohann 2001-10-19 14:19 ` Oystein Viggen @ 2001-10-20 6:01 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-20 9:39 ` Simon Josefsson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Daniel Pittman @ 2001-10-20 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw) On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: > I think that many people want to use something like Netscape for > viewing HTML, even if Emacs/W3 is installed. IMHO there should be a > simple variable which people can set to achieve this. > > This can be implemented by changing mailcap-mime-data such that it > checks the variable, not only looks whether the w3-foo function is > bound. > > Opinions? Yes, please. Actually, allowing me to easily control what is used to render HTML to text would be ideal; I want to pipe it through (for example) html2text(1) rather than use W3. Daniel -- Crying loud, you're crawling on the floor Just a beautiful baby, You're nothing more -- Switchblade Symphony, _Clown_ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 6:01 ` Daniel Pittman @ 2001-10-20 9:39 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 10:55 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-20 11:47 ` Daniel Pittman 0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Simon Josefsson @ 2001-10-20 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: >> I think that many people want to use something like Netscape for >> viewing HTML, even if Emacs/W3 is installed. IMHO there should be a >> simple variable which people can set to achieve this. >> >> This can be implemented by changing mailcap-mime-data such that it >> checks the variable, not only looks whether the w3-foo function is >> bound. >> >> Opinions? > > Yes, please. Actually, allowing me to easily control what is used to > render HTML to text would be ideal; I want to pipe it through (for > example) html2text(1) rather than use W3. Doesn't text/html: html2text %s; copiousoutput or something in ~/.mailcap work? Hopefully Netscape won't cater to that line. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 9:39 ` Simon Josefsson @ 2001-10-20 10:55 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-20 11:25 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 11:47 ` Daniel Pittman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-20 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes: > Hopefully Netscape won't cater to that line. How does the `test' feature work? I'm sure a test could be included that prevents Netscape from looking at the line. kai -- Lisp is kinda like tpircstsoP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 10:55 ` Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-20 11:25 ` Simon Josefsson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Simon Josefsson @ 2001-10-20 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: Daniel Pittman, ding Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes: > >> Hopefully Netscape won't cater to that line. > > How does the `test' feature work? I'm sure a test could be included > that prevents Netscape from looking at the line. It is described in RFC 1524, basicly it is a external program that is able to give a 0/1 answer. But neither Mozilla nor Netscape seems to listen to a text/html line in .mailcap anyway. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 9:39 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 10:55 ` Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-20 11:47 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-20 12:00 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 18:08 ` Kai Großjohann 1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Daniel Pittman @ 2001-10-20 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: [...] >> Yes, please. Actually, allowing me to easily control what is used to >> render HTML to text would be ideal; I want to pipe it through (for >> example) html2text(1) rather than use W3. > > Doesn't > > text/html: html2text %s; copiousoutput > > or something in ~/.mailcap work? Er, didn't last time I tried... ...time passes... ...or maybe not. I thought I did have it in there. Let me try again. No. Adding it and restarting XEmacs (and, thus, Gnus) completely failed to cause to it take effect: the HTML mail still caused W3 to load. Lesse... Within `mailcap-mime-data', we have my values *first* in the list, with the W3 values last. W3 is definitely chosen; there isn't an issue with searching this data in reverse order, is there? More testing... Found it. The breakage comes for `mm-display-inline' Basically, `mm-display-part' comes in, makes sure the mailcap files are parsed, locates the viewer from the mailcap data (getting html2text), then asks: (if (and (mm-inlinable-p handle) (mm-inlined-p handle)) When this passes, it calls `mm-display-inline' which unconditionally uses W3. The HTML part isn't considered to be capable of being inlined unless W3 is present. Now, having looked at this, I can most certainly go and fix this problem by redefining the stuff in the inlined type data structures to call my shell command and parse the content that way. However, in answer to your original question: No, adding that to .mailcap or *any* other mailcap file will never work when the W3 library is installed. So, bug or feature? You decide ... but I would suggest adding a fairly easy to reach default that let the end user call a shell command to reformat the text and make it inline rather than forcing W3. I will post my solution once it's written; it should be capable of doing that if someone with commit access wants to add it. It waits on my finishing cleaning my bedroom so I have somewhere to sleep tonight, though. :) > Hopefully Netscape won't cater to that line. It seems to be brighter than that, at least for versions of Netscape equal to Mozilla 0.9.5+. :) Daniel -- Time spent in the advertising business seems to create a permanent deformity like the Chinese habit of foot-bonding. -- Dean Acheson ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 11:47 ` Daniel Pittman @ 2001-10-20 12:00 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 18:08 ` Kai Großjohann 1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Simon Josefsson @ 2001-10-20 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: >> Doesn't >> >> text/html: html2text %s; copiousoutput >> >> or something in ~/.mailcap work? > > Er, didn't last time I tried... ...time passes... > > ...or maybe not. I thought I did have it in there. Let me try again. > > No. Adding it and restarting XEmacs (and, thus, Gnus) completely failed > to cause to it take effect: the HTML mail still caused W3 to load. > > Lesse... Within `mailcap-mime-data', we have my values *first* in the > list, with the W3 values last. > > W3 is definitely chosen; there isn't an issue with searching this data > in reverse order, is there? More testing... > > Found it. The breakage comes for `mm-display-inline' > > Basically, `mm-display-part' comes in, makes sure the mailcap files are > parsed, locates the viewer from the mailcap data (getting html2text), > then asks: > > (if (and (mm-inlinable-p handle) > (mm-inlined-p handle)) > > When this passes, it calls `mm-display-inline' which unconditionally > uses W3. The HTML part isn't considered to be capable of being inlined > unless W3 is present. > > > Now, having looked at this, I can most certainly go and fix this problem > by redefining the stuff in the inlined type data structures to call my > shell command and parse the content that way. > > However, in answer to your original question: No, adding that to > .mailcap or *any* other mailcap file will never work when the W3 library > is installed. > > So, bug or feature? You decide ... but I would suggest adding a fairly > easy to reach default that let the end user call a shell command to > reformat the text and make it inline rather than forcing W3. I'd say bug, if you say something in .mailcap, Gnus should use that unless you've told it otherwise somewhere else or if there is a good reason to do something else. > I will post my solution once it's written; it should be capable of doing > that if someone with commit access wants to add it. IMHO even if nothing is specified in .mailcap, Gnus should use a customizable variable to say whether w3, w3m or some other Emacs web browsers should be used instead of hardcoding it to w3. So you should be able to override the text/html viewer used either by .mailcap or by changing the variable (the latter having more priority). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 11:47 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-20 12:00 ` Simon Josefsson @ 2001-10-20 18:08 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-21 1:41 ` Daniel Pittman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-20 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: > When this passes, it calls `mm-display-inline' which unconditionally > uses W3. The HTML part isn't considered to be capable of being inlined > unless W3 is present. But there are variables that you can use to tell Gnus that text/html is not inlineable. (Inlinable?) kai -- Lisp is kinda like tpircstsoP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-20 18:08 ` Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-21 1:41 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-21 8:35 ` Kai Großjohann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Daniel Pittman @ 2001-10-21 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw) On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: > Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: > >> When this passes, it calls `mm-display-inline' which unconditionally >> uses W3. The HTML part isn't considered to be capable of being >> inlined unless W3 is present. > > But there are variables that you can use to tell Gnus that text/html > is not inlineable. (Inlinable?) Er, yes... but won't that stop me doing what I want? I *want* HTML parts to be inline. I have enough people who can only send HTML mail without plain text parts[1] that I can't just disable it the way I want. The price of having end users, don't you know. ;) So, I want HTML rendering and I want it to be done inline. Sending it to an external process that required going to another window would be highly filled with suckage. So, no, I don't think "not inline" is the right way to set up my Gnus rendering, is it? Daniel Footnotes: [1] Thank you *so* much, Microsoft. -- Of course I lie to people. But I lie altruistically - for our mutual good. The lie is the basic building block of good manners. That may seem mildly shocking to a moralist - but then what isn't? -- Quentin Crisp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML 2001-10-21 1:41 ` Daniel Pittman @ 2001-10-21 8:35 ` Kai Großjohann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-10-21 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: >> Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> writes: >> >>> When this passes, it calls `mm-display-inline' which unconditionally >>> uses W3. The HTML part isn't considered to be capable of being >>> inlined unless W3 is present. >> >> But there are variables that you can use to tell Gnus that text/html >> is not inlineable. (Inlinable?) > > Er, yes... but won't that stop me doing what I want? Oops, of course you're right. Sorry. [time passes] But can't you augment mm-inline-media-tests with something that calls w3m.el? Maybe replace the text/html entry rather than augmenting it. kai -- Lisp is kinda like tpircstsoP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-21 14:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-10-19 13:39 Allow people to circumvent W3 for HTML Kai Großjohann 2001-10-19 14:19 ` Oystein Viggen 2001-10-19 15:52 ` Frank Schmitt 2001-10-19 16:24 ` David S. Goldberg 2001-10-19 17:54 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-19 18:09 ` David S. Goldberg 2001-10-19 21:27 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-20 10:11 ` Per Abrahamsen 2001-10-20 18:30 ` Henrik Enberg 2001-10-21 8:20 ` Per Abrahamsen 2001-10-21 14:25 ` Lloyd Zusman 2001-10-19 16:30 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-21 12:06 ` Oystein Viggen 2001-10-20 6:01 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-20 9:39 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 10:55 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-20 11:25 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 11:47 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-20 12:00 ` Simon Josefsson 2001-10-20 18:08 ` Kai Großjohann 2001-10-21 1:41 ` Daniel Pittman 2001-10-21 8:35 ` Kai Großjohann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).