From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12554 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Balker Rasmussen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Yet another washing function. Date: 08 Oct 1997 18:23:29 +0200 Message-ID: <0fen5w8br2.fsf@heimdal.mjolner.dk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152070 4406 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:14:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA17434 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 10:50:14 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA01174 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 12:42:52 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:23:40 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18278 invoked by uid 504); 8 Oct 1997 16:23:32 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 18275 invoked from network); 8 Oct 1997 16:23:32 -0000 Original-Received: from heimdal.mjolner.dk (130.225.8.65) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 1997 16:23:31 -0000 Original-Received: (from lbr@localhost) by heimdal.mjolner.dk (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA03969; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:23:29 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Greg Stark's message of "05 Oct 1997 20:57:31 -0400" Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12554 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12554 Greg Stark writes: > I've noticed that article washing is a noticeable delay. Quite! If I try to view a LARGE article which I know what's in, I might as well press C-g after a couple of seconds to avoid waiting for ages. The article appears pretty much like I'd expect if I'd waited the entire time, but I haven't looked into it further. That's annoying... Relevant hooks (that I know of): gnus-article-display-hook's value is (gnus-article-highlight gnus-article-hide-pgp gnus-article-hide-headers-if-wanted gnus-article-hide-boring-headers gnus-article-treat-overstrike gnus-article-maybe-highlight) gnus-article-prepare-hook's value is (gnus-article-de-quoted-unreadable) > (subst-char-in-region (point-min) (point-max) ?\221 ?`) > (subst-char-in-region (point-min) (point-max) ?\222 ?') > (subst-char-in-region (point-min) (point-max) ?\223 ?\") > (subst-char-in-region (point-min) (point-max) ?\224 ?\") Might as well have NOUNDO set to t, right? -- Lars Balker Rasmussen, Software Engineer, Mjolner Informatics ApS lbr@mjolner.dk