Re: [rgnus] FCC in message-mode to nnml group?

[Lars Balker Rasmussen <gnort@daimi.aau.dk>]

Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov> writes:
> Would/could it work? If so, what would the semantics be? (the message
> would need to be filed to a dynamic numeric filename I suppose). I'd
> like the reply that I save to be filed in the *same* nnml folder, for
> threading purposes.

Sure it'd work.  Naïve pseudo-code follows:

(defvar mdb-nnml-group)
(defun mdb-decide-nnml-group () 
    (setq mdb-nnml-group "~/Mail/foo/"))

(defun mdb-return-and-add-to-nnml-counter ()
;; use (concat mdb-nnml-group ".next") to decide next num and add to it
)

(addhook message-setup-hook 'mdb-decide-nnml-group)

(setq message-default-headers
    (concat "Fcc: " mdb-nnml-group (mdb-return-and-add-to-nnml-counter) "\n"))

> Or does everyone just bag FCC: use and instead opt for BCC: or CC:?

I use old-fashioned Fcc: because I like it simple :-)
-- 
Lars Balker Rasmussen                   <URL:http://www.daimi.aau.dk/~gnort/>