Re: SpamAssassin support added

[John Owens <jowens@ece.ucdavis.edu>]

Ted Zlatanov writes:
    On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, jowens@ucdavis.edu wrote:
    > I second this - I reach inside the SpamAssassin-wrapped message to
    > pull out the original message and then send it to spamcop and
    > uce@ftc.gov. Spamcop, at least, is happy with a message from me; the
    > contents of the message are simply the whole spam message including
    > headers. 
    
    I think you want something like the Gmane support in spam-report.el.
    
I'll take a look.

    I don't use the SA wrapping myself, so I haven't had this problem.
    Maybe it should be automatically detected by the spam-report function
    and the message should be unwrapped before sending to an address.
    
I think it's a fairly common situation that people don't have control
over what happens upstream - mine get wrapped by another mail server
that I don't have access to and then forwarded to me. 

I think I actually prefer the wrapping, since then I get the virgin
message without any SpamAssassin-applied additional headers. Thus if
spam-report.el unwrapped it for me and could send it along, that would
be ideal.

JDO