From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82663 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bromley@lavabit.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Decode base64 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:26:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <17329.212.84.206.250.1356261970.squirrel@lavabit.com> References: <51506.199.48.147.36.1356071730.squirrel@lavabit.com> <871uej7u6g.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356262067 5380 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2012 11:27:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M30928@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Dec 23 12:28:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmjiq-0006pz-RX for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:28:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1TmjhD-0004Ww-GQ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:26:19 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmjh9-0004P2-L2 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:26:15 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmjh8-0008G9-Ag for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:26:15 -0600 Original-Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmjh6-00008c-Mp for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:26:12 +0100 Original-Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B1C11BCDE for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:26:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lavabit.com (torproject.org.all.de [212.84.206.250]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id CUDKAGYN9PQQ for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:26:10 -0600 Original-Received: from 212.84.206.250 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bromley) by lavabit.com with HTTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:26:10 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=kew6GXuAE7dfgorcROd32q5OJemnu+9IN5E9QKimf8J83vLpIR9n4+Z5NBhFHYskt8faomC6YmycixxNMsvFsQkVIpmJP12DuqgeFDKyt8sVrJEr2FsvNtehDODKlMEwzmKGw44MD149cTEFuc6dHGzwNp2a53ZzO/IHu9JGYPw=; h=Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <871uej7u6g.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.5007 Ham tokens: 0.001-2--12h-0s--0d--setq, 0.008-269--1914h-12s--0d--decode, 0.008-1--2h-0s--1d--Decode, 0.016-1--1h-0s--1d--nnfolder, 0.018-8007--60785h-897s--0d--Sent Spam tokens: 0.992-1966--92h-9094s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.988-1974--140h-9342s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.988-2096--154h-9944s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.988-2096--154h-9944s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.986-2076--174h-9944s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: ham -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [72.249.41.33 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5007] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82663 Archived-At: > Do you have an example of where it fails, somewhere? In the `nnfolder+archive:Sent' group. (It shows `raw' messages.) I'm using (setq gnus-message-archive-group "Sent").