From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5250 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Goldberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-mh.el Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:46:52 -0500 Message-ID: <18122.825104812@blackbird.mitre.org> References: Reply-To: dsg@mitre.org NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.43) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart_Fri_Feb_23_14:46:45_1996-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145882 32251 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:31:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA09284 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:24:07 -0800 Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (linus.mitre.org [129.83.10.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 20:46:58 +0100 Original-Received: from blackbird.mitre.org (blackbird.mitre.org [129.83.10.172]) by linus.mitre.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA00697 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackbird.mitre.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA18124 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:46:55 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-reply-to: Your message of 23 Feb 1996 09:55:13 PST. Original-Lines: 25 X-Face: GUaHTH@nS>[7,ME@-gYZ4#Wl{z"99k@[[Y8AcP0x1paqu.,z9,XSV1WI>{q3f6^e5(zrit< 4fV&VHhmE`uidRqtmG27;si9&r;#KSF~E#$%W8w(xdp)H4tW=\2XOk~3=@oGqqpj;m4xfOw;y26396 &,34@9#~4;@*S;E0cq"LM9N(us4P%F(Nxis'Vvfm9?KufH;:Q$dMa-QWGLR&Kd0`LJZE8xb*>^yN>b ]_NcU:E=Zn\1=#/(OS2 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5250 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5250 --Multipart_Fri_Feb_23_14:46:45_1996-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I use nnmh for my mail backend. In addition to missing sequences (and not just unseen, by the way), I've made my own functions for replying and forwarding that are more closely tied to mh-e. Doing it my way causes conflicts between the Gnus and mh-e window config stuff and is most certainly inefficient so given the thread about memory usage I don't recommend it for anyone else :-) What I get are the annotations on messages I've replied to or forwarded and I get to use my preferred replcomps, both of which are important to me. I guess that since I don't use XEmacs I don't have a problem with mhe being non-graphical, but I certainly agree about the clunkiness. It's the reason I started using Gnus for reading mail in the first place. --Multipart_Fri_Feb_23_14:46:45_1996-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Dave Goldberg Post: The Mitre Corporation\MS B305\202 Burlington Rd.\Bedford, MA 01730 Phone: 617-271-3887 Email: dsg@mitre.org --Multipart_Fri_Feb_23_14:46:45_1996-1--