From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3953
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: About to-addresses and followup [poll]
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 02:17:05 +0100
Message-ID: <199511140117.CAA19908@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <umtn3a086wz.fsf@bank.cis.ohio-state.edu>
	<199511132349.AAA18160@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
	<umtka5483el.fsf@bank.cis.ohio-state.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144769 28077 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:12:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA14609 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 18:06:48 -0800
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <CAA00969@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 02:17:51 +0100
Original-Received: from ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (ssv4.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id CAA00310; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 02:15:43 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id CAA19908; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 02:17:05 +0100
Original-To: Sudish Joseph <joseph@cis.ohio-state.edu>
In-reply-to: Sudish Joseph's message of 13 Nov 1995 19:07:30 -0500
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3953
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3953

>>>>> "SJ" == Sudish Joseph <joseph@cis.ohio-state.edu> writes:

SJ> But it seems redundant to have both a to-address and a
SJ> to-list parameter.

The current behavior is better for closed list.  For example, if I had
set to-address for the ding folder, you wouldn't receive two copies of
this message, as you will now.

As I see it, to-address should be set on closed lists and to-list
should be set on open lists.  

If the message you reply to have the `Mail-Copies-To:' header
suggested by Lars, that should be able to overwrite the default
algorithm for that folder.  Then you could set `Mail-Copies-To: never'
when writing to a list you subscribe to, and `Mail-Copies-To:
your@address' when writing to a list you don't subscribe to.