From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4028
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Edward J. Sabol" <sabol@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: September Gnus 0.13 is released
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 10:50:19 -0500
Message-ID: <199511171550.KAA23083@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <w8sraz83w2l.fsf@narfi.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144835 28300 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:13:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA06238 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 08:55:51 -0800
Original-Received: from thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov (thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.127.167]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <QAA01977@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 16:50:20 +0100
Original-Received: (from sabol@localhost) by thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov (LHEA9504/950407.s1) id KAA23083; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 10:50:19 -0500
Original-To: Gnus Mailing List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <w8sraz83w2l.fsf@narfi.ifi.uio.no> (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on 17 Nov 1995 01:48:34 +0100)
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4028
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4028

Excerpts from mail: (17-Nov-95) Re: September Gnus 0.13 is released by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> So, like, 19.28 people can get by with 5.0.12. It's a working Gnus.
> September Gnus is alpha, and has quite a lot of neat stuff in it, but
> there's nothing really Earth-shattering about it.

Well, speaking as someone who's been using September Gnus since it's
inception, the prospect of going back to Gnus 5.0.12 is not something I look
forward to. I'll probably stay with September Gnus 0.12, bugs and all.

Still, I understand your reasons, and I agree with them. I'd probably do the
same thing. That's not going to stop me from complaining about it though.

And it'll probably take longer than a month for the FSF to release 19.30, and
when you factor in the time it will take my sysadmins to install it, it'll be
a good two months...