From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4091
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: William Perry <wmperry@spry.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Latest XEmacs lossage in sgnus 0.15
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 1995 16:30:55 -0800
Message-ID: <199511260030.QAA00458@monolith.spry.com>
References: <199511251913.LAA00297@monolith.spry.com>
	<m2ka4opbsw.fsf@diana.miranova.com>
Reply-To: wmperry@spry.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144890 28496 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:14:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:14:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA21501 for <steve@miranova.com>; Sat, 25 Nov 1995 17:15:00 -0800
Original-Received: from homer.spry.com (homer.spry.com [165.121.12.50]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <BAA00697@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 01:25:06 +0100
Original-Received: from monolith.spry.com (wmperry@spry-xy1-p16 [165.121.12.216]) by homer.spry.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA23691; Sat, 25 Nov 1995 16:25:14 -0800
Original-Received: (from wmperry@localhost) by monolith.spry.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id QAA00458; Sat, 25 Nov 1995 16:30:55 -0800
Original-To: steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur)
Errors-to: wmperry@spry.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
In-Reply-To: <m2ka4opbsw.fsf@diana.miranova.com>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4091
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4091

Steven L. Baur writes:
> transient-mark-mode is documented to exist on XEmacs 19.13, but does
> not.  I guess this makes it a documentation bug.
> The fix is trivial.

  Just a quick note - the test in there should techinically be 'boundp' not
'fboundp', since you are checking it as a variable.  In some psychotic
instances, someone might have transient-mark-mode defined as a convenience
function in XEmacs, but not use the same variable name for storage.  Just
in case... :)

-Bill P