From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4121
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Signature in forwarded messages
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:07:24 +0100
Message-ID: <199511291007.LAA17282@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <199511281709.LAA14735@galil.austnsc.tandem.com>
	<199511290254.SAA03517@miranova.com>
	<ebupv95y9.fsf@steffi.accessone.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144915 28580 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:15:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA09403 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 02:57:02 -0800
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <LAA25902@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:08:27 +0100
Original-Received: from ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (ssv4.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id LAA28918; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:05:44 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id LAA17282; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:07:24 +0100
Original-To: robert@steffi.accessone.com
In-reply-to: robert@steffi.accessone.com's message of 29 Nov 1995 00:32:30
	-0800
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4121
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4121


Putting the signature in front of an included item make sense when the
included item doesn't have a natural end marker.  Forwarded messages
does have such an end marker.

Having the signature in front does not interact well with attempts to
automatically hide or highlight the signature.