From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4150
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Edward J. Sabol" <sabol@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Signature in forwarded messages
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 14:26:35 -0500
Message-ID: <199511291926.OAA07051@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <w8sn39fwbja.fsf@gymir.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144940 28686 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:15:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA12572 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 12:19:32 -0800
Original-Received: from thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov (thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.127.167]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA15010@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 20:26:41 +0100
Original-Received: (from sabol@localhost) by thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov (LHEA9504/950407.s1) id OAA07051; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 14:26:35 -0500
Original-To: Gnus Mailing List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <w8sn39fwbja.fsf@gymir.ifi.uio.no> (larsi@ifi.uio.no)
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4150
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4150

Excerpts from mail: (29-Nov-95) Re: Signature in forwarded messages by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> So, I dunno. I have no strong feelings on the subject. If y'all feel
> that the signature should go after the forwarded message, I'll do that.
> It would make automatic signature handling easier.

If we're voting, I vote for after the forwarded message. It would make sense
to put it before the forwarded message only if the forwarded message did not
have a end delimiter, but, since it does, I really think it should come after.