From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4221 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Scott Blachowicz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Resending (was Re: Signature in forwarded messages) Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1995 08:51:43 -0800 Message-ID: <199512011651.IAA01163@block.statsci.com> References: Reply-To: scott@statsci.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144998 28882 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:16:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA00262 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:50:41 -0800 Original-Received: from block.statsci.com (block.statsci.com [198.145.127.26]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 17:52:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by block.statsci.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA01163; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 08:51:44 -0800 Original-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Dec 1995 04:57:37 +0100." Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4221 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4221 larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) wrote: > Do you use this "resend" thingie much? I'm always forwarded things, > and I don't think I haven't been resent a single mail ever... I would > think it would be somewhat more confusing than simple forwarding? I use it. I generally use it when I'm forwarding an article of interest to my own account on a different machine (generally from work to home). Occasionally, I have a co-worker "bounce" (that's what elm calls it; MH calls it "dist"; the headers are "Resent-" - more letters to base a key binding mnemonic on :-)) a message to me so I can reply to the original sender. Since I have/use MH, I just pipe the message off | rcvdist scott@sabami RET and that does the trick. It'd be REAL nice if there were a way to apply the same command to each of the process-marked messages without having to re-confirm the command every time (I have the same complaint about saving process-marked messages to a folder). BTW, I mentioned that a long time ago - I don't remember finding a way to do it unless it was something like double prefix the command and click your heals a few times? :-)) Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 StatSci, a div of MathSoft, Inc. 1700 Westlake Ave N #500 scott@statsci.com Seattle, WA USA 98109 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org