From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4225 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Scott Blachowicz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Multiple confirmations (was: Re: Resending (was Re: Signature in forwarded messages)) Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1995 11:19:37 -0800 Message-ID: <199512011919.LAA04143@block.statsci.com> References: <199512011824.TAA22479@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> Reply-To: scott@statsci.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145002 28900 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:16:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@ifi.uio.no, ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA01825 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 12:14:52 -0800 Original-Received: from maud.ifi.uio.no (0@maud.ifi.uio.no [129.240.74.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 20:21:52 +0100 Original-Received: from block.statsci.com (block.statsci.com [198.145.127.26]) by maud.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 20:21:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by block.statsci.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA04143; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 11:19:37 -0800 Original-To: Per Abrahamsen In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Dec 1995 19:24:07 +0100." <199512011824.TAA22479@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4225 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4225 >>>>> "Per" == Per Abrahamsen Per> While that is an excellent suggestion, I think using the same Per> convention as `save-some-buffers' and `query-replace' would be more Per> Emacs-like. I.e. typing `!' means "yes, and don't ask for the Per> remaining items". The problem is that it isn't just a y-or-n response it is looking for. It's asking for a folder name or a command, so it's not quite the same type of operation as `save-some-buffers'. Maybe a "!" response by itself could trigger it, but that doesn't really "feel right". Maybe a `M-!' response? I suppose I COULD write my own wrapper function to do the job and rebind the keys to my wrapper, but that's too much work for the amount of benefit (I just don't spend enough time in the newsreader to warrant it at the moment...real work keeps getting in the way). Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 StatSci, a div of MathSoft, Inc. 1700 Westlake Ave N #500 scott@statsci.com Seattle, WA USA 98109 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org