From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4427 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: William Perry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New features + feature freeze? Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 14:22:34 -0800 Message-ID: <199512142222.OAA22142@monolith.spry.com> References: <"nz11.rz.un.171:14.12.95.19.20.57"@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <199512142058.AA057994703@chroma.ece.ucdavis.edu> Reply-To: wmperry@spry.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145173 29531 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:19:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jens Lautenbacher , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA28412 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 14:49:31 -0800 Original-Received: from homer.spry.com (homer.spry.com [165.121.12.50]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 23:16:17 +0100 Original-Received: from monolith.spry.com (wmperry@monolith [198.185.1.186]) by homer.spry.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA25209; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 14:16:25 -0800 Original-Received: (from wmperry@localhost) by monolith.spry.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA22142; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 14:22:34 -0800 Original-To: Wes Hardaker Errors-to: wmperry@spry.com X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4427 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4427 Wes Hardaker writes: > > Jens Lautenbacher writes: > > |> I hope I'll get my fingers on Wes' code soon, so I can find some time > |> (maybe) for doing a little more than bugfixing... > > Well, its pretty much ready to go. I'm just trying to figure out why > I'm gaining memory. It looks like XEmacs keeps a cache of all the > glyphs you ever make, thus increasing the memory size of the > application by leaps and bounds if you turn this on while running > gnus. I can't figure out anyway to kill created glyphs. Ideas? Are you using the relocating allocation? If not, no memory is ever freed back to the OS, and glyphs take up space like anything else. Make sure you are dropping all pointers to the created glyphs, or XEmacs won't GC them and colors/ximages won't be unallocated either. Bad bad bad. :) -Bill P.